PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN THE INTERPRETATION ОF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Keywords:
presumption of innocence, the European Court of Human Rights, interpretationAbstract
The article deals with issues related to the interpretation of the principle of presumption of innocence by the European Court of Human Rights. The general character problems are highlighted. The practice of the European Court of Human Rights proceedings of the relevant categories of cases is analyzed.
References
Baradaran S. Restoring the Presumption of innocence / S. Baradaran // Ohio State Law Review. — 2011. — № 72. — P. 729–730 (and citations).
Ashworth A. Self-incrimination in European Human Rights Law — A Pregnant Pragmatism? / A. Ashworth // Cardezo Law Review. — December 2008. — Vol. 30. — Р. 751–773.
Презумпция невиновности в контексте прецедентной практики Европейского Суда по правам человека / М. Визенитин // Russian Yearbook of the European Convention on human rights. — 2015. — № 1 — Р. 258–264.
Tadros V. Rethinking the presiumption of innocence / V. Tadros // Criminal Law and Philosophy. — 2007. — Vol. 1. — № 2. — Р. 193–213.
Galetta A. The changing nature of the presumption of innocence in today's surveillance societies: rewrite human rights or regulate the use of surveillance technologies? / A. Galetta // European Journal of law and techology. — 2013. — Vol. 4. — № 2. — Р. 6.