NARRATIVE ON THE ESSENCE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF GUARANTEEING EFFECTIVE MEANS OF LEGAL PROTECTION IN THE CONTEXT OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2304-1587/2023-25-1(36)-2

Keywords:

system of principles of administrative procedure, guarantee of effective means of legal protection, administrative body, complaint, administrative procedure, protection of rights and freedoms of individuals, administrative appeal, administrative courts

Abstract

The article examines the principle of guaranteeing effective means of legal protection, which is an important component of the system of principles of administrative procedure and which is implemented, usually at the level of the institute of administrative appeal. The essence of this principle has been established, which manifests itself and boils down to the fact that a person can appeal any decision, action or inaction of an administrative body in an administrative procedure, that is, it is possible to appeal to the subject of the review of the complaint (as a general rule, this is an appeal to of a higher body or an official of an administrative body that adopted an administrative act, procedural decision, action). It was established that the principle of guaranteeing effective means of legal protection has two main components: a) the right of a person to appeal decisions, actions or inaction of an administrative body in the procedure of administrative appeal; b) the duty of an administrative body to inform a person about the method, procedure and terms of appeal of an administrative act that negatively affects the right, freedom or legitimate interest of that person. It was found that the principle of guaranteeing effective means of legal protection is influenced by: a) the norms of the national legal space (the Constitution of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine "On Administrative Procedure" and others); b) provisions of "soft" law of Council of Europe bodies; (c) Convention on Human Rights; (d) decision of the ECHR. Attention is emphasized and it is justified that the implementation of European standards at the level of public administration translates the activity of administrative bodies into a modern format by guaranteeing proper appeal in such a way as to reduce the number of disputed issues, as a result of which the burden on administrative courts will be reduced due to the reduction of the number of appeals. Definition of the main advantages of an out-of-court appeal over a judicial one. It is emphasized the need to carry out complex studies of the principle of guaranteeing effective means of legal protection of the content, taking into account various aspects of the manifestation of the specified principle, in the context of the latest challenges of today.

References

Про адміністративну процедуру : Закон України від 17.02.2022 № 2073-IX. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2073-20#Text (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Recommendation Rec (2000)10 on Codes of conduct for public officials (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 May 2000). URL: https: //rm.coe.int/1680534424 (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Конституція України від 28.06.1996 № 254к/96-ВР. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Закон про адміністративну процедуру наблизить Україну до євростандартів. URL: https://rpr.org.ua/news/zakon-pro-administratyvnu-protseduru-nablyzyt-ukrainu-do-ievrostandartiv-eksperty/ (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Миколенко О.І. Термінологічний аналіз положень Закону України «Про адміністративну процедуру». Правова держава. 2022. № 46. С. 62–68. URL: http://pd.onu.edu.ua/article/view/257809 (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Науково-практичний коментар до проєкту Закону України «Про адміністративну процедуру» / О.Ф. Андрійко та ін. ; за заг. ред. В.М. Тимощука. Київ : ФОП Мишалов Д.В., 2019. 460 с.

Resolution (77) 31 On the protection of the individual in relation to the acts of administrative authorities: Council of Europe Committee of Ministers at 28.09.1977. URL: https://rm.coe.int/16804dec56 (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Recommendation no. R (80) 2 Оf the committee of ministers concerning the exercise of discretionary powers by administrative authorities (11 March 1980) URL: https://rm.coe.int/16804f22ae (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Recommendation no. R (87) 16 Оf the committee of ministers to member states on administrative procedures affecting a large number of persons ( 17 September 1987). URL: https://rm.coe.int/cmrec-87-16-on-administrativeprocedures-affecting-a-large-number-of-p/1680a43b59 (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Recommendation Rec (2001)9 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on alternatives to litigation between administrative authorities and private parties (5 September 2001). URL: https://rm.coe.int/16805e2b59(дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)7 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on good administration, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 June 2007. URL: https://www.refworld.org/docid/5a4cac754.html (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Бойко І.В. Євроінтеграційний зміст і значення Закону України «Про адміністративну процедуру». Південноукраїнський правничий часопис. 2022. С. 190–198. URL: http://www.sulj.oduvs.od.ua/archive/2022/4/part_1/29.pdf (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

European Convention on Human Rights. URL: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Шатарська Т. Право на ефективний засіб захисту прав і свобод, гарантованих Конвенцією. URL: https://www.shatarska.in.ua/13-pravo-na-efektivnij-zasib-zaxistu-prav-i-svobod-garantovanix-konvenciyeyunavesti-priklad-rishennya-yespl-u-konkretnij-spravi/ (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Kudła v. Poland, Applications No. 30210/96, Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights, 26 October 2000, available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-58920%22]} (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Smith and Grady v. United Kingdom, Applications Nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights, 27 September 1999, available at: https://www.refworld.org/cases,ECHR,47fdfac80.html (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Надання ефективних засобів правового захисту, що забезпечать дотримання розумного строку розгляду кримінальних справ: порівняльне дослідження в рамках проєкту Ради Європи «Дотримання прав людини в системі кримінальної юстиції України». URL: https://rm.coe.int/2020-06-18-comparative-study-ukrfinal-clean/16809ec20a (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, Applications № 57818/09, Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights, 07.02.2017, available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-11390%22]} (дата звернення: 08.04.2023).

Published

2023-05-30