ATTRIBUTION TO A STATE OF WRONGFUL CONDUCT OF ANINSURRECTIONAL MOVEMENT WHICH SUBSEQUENTLY BECOMES THE NEW GOVERNMENT

Authors

  • S. S. Andreychenko

Keywords:

international responsibility of States, attribution of conduct to a state, insurrectional or other movement

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issue of attribution to a State of wrongful conduct of an insurrectional movement which subsequently becomes the new Government. The theory of the continuity which exists between the new organization of the State and that of the insurrectional movement as a basis for the attribution of conduct to the State is considered. The notion of an «insurrectional» or «other» movement in the context of the application of paragraph 1 of article 10 of the Draft articles on responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts 2001 are analyzed.

References

Griebel J. New Developments Regarding the Rules of Attribution? The International Court of Justice’s Decision in Bosnia v. Serbia’ / J. Griebel, M. Plücken // Leiden Journal of International Law. — 2008. — Vol. 21. Issue 3. — P. 601–622.

Abass A. Complete International Law / A. Abass. — Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2012. — 776 р.

Glahn G von. Law among Nations: An Introduction to Public International Law (8th Edition) / G. von Glahn, J. L. Taulbee. — New York, San Francisco, Boston, 2007. — 736 р.

Лукашук И. И. Право международной ответственности / И. И. Лукашук. — М. : Волтерс Клувер, 2004. — 432 с.

Case of John H. Hanna v. the United States of America (1873) // Reports of International Arbitral Awards. — Vol. XXIX. — P. 143–145.

Italy v. Venezuela. The Sambiaggio Cаse (1903) // Reports of International Arbitral Awards. — Vol. X. — P. 499–525.

Commentaries to the draft articles on Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts adopted by the International Law Commission at its fifty-third session (2001) // Yearbook of the International LawCommission. — 2001. — Vol. II, Part Two. Report of the Commissionto the General Assemblyon the workof its fifty-third session. — P. 31–143.

Amerasinghe C. F. State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens / C. F. Amerasinghe. — Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967. — 324 р.

Matas D. Armed Opposition Groups / D. Matas // Manitoba Law Journal. — 1997. — Vol. 24. — P. 621–634.

Tomuschat С. The Applicability of Human Rights Law to Insurgent Movements // Crisis Management and Humanitarian Protection. H. Fischer, U. Froissart, W. Heintschel von Heinegg, and C. Raap (eds.). — Berlin : Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2004. — Р. 573–591.

Kreijen G. State failure, sovereignty and effectiveness : legal lessons rom the decolonization of Sub-Saharan Africa / G. Kreijen. — Leiden ; Boston : M. Nijhoff, 2004. — 386 p.

Глухенький С. Г. Негосударственные субъекты в современном международном праве: дис. … канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.10 / С. Г. Глухенький. — Москва, 2011. — 252 с.

Dumberry P. New State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts by an Insurrectional Movement / P. Dumberry // The European Journal of International Law. — 2006. — Vol. 17. № 3. — Р. 605–621.

Heijer D. M. Europe and Extraterritorial Asylum. Doctoral thesis / D. M. Heijer. — Institute of Immigration Law, Faculty of Law, Leiden University, 2011. — 347 р.

Published

2023-07-05