Peer-review process
The journal applies a double-blind review process, which ensures objectivity and impartiality in the evaluation of scientific materials. The identities of authors and reviewers are not disclosed at any stage of the review process.
Reviewer Selection Criteria
Reviewers are selected by the editorial board based on:
- scientific specialization and expertise in the relevant field;
- publication record in the subject area of the study;
- absence of conflicts of interest;
- prior experience in scientific reviewing.
During the review, the following aspects are evaluated:
- relevance and scientific novelty of the research;
- theoretical and practical significance;
- methodological soundness;
- reliability of results;
- clarity and logical structure of the manuscript;
- compliance with ethical standards and journal requirements.
Review Timelines
The average review period is 3 to 4 weeks, but it may vary depending on the complexity of the manuscript and the availability of reviewers.
Documentation
Reviews are conducted through the journal’s editorial system. Each review is submitted in written form and includes reasoned conclusions and recommendations regarding the manuscript’s further consideration.
Based on the reviews, the editorial board makes one of the following decisions:
- accept the article for publication;
- accept after revisions;
- send for re-review;
- reject the article.
The final decision on publication is made by the editorial board.
